Study CharacteriStudy CharacteriPopulationPopulationInterventionsInterventionsOutcomesOutcomesStudy TypeStudy TypeBackgroundBackgroundTimingTimingDemographicsDemographicsEndovascular theEndovascular theStandard medicalStandard medicalAngiographic OutAngiographic OutClinical OutcomeClinical OutcomeRandomized ContrRandomized ContrProspective CohoProspective CohoOnset-to-needleOnset-to-needleOnset-to-puncturOnset-to-puncturAge (Mean)Age (Mean)Male SexMale SexAge (Median)Age (Median)TICI 2b/3TICI 2b/3Distal emboliDistal emboliTICI IndependentTICI IndependentmRS 0-2mRS 0-2sICHsICHMortalityMortalityNIHSSNIHSSmRs 0-3mRs 0-3
Tag Details
3/3 (100.0%) of studies are associated with this tag. 3/3 (100.0%) of studies are associated with this tag & its descendants.
Associated StudiesSelected Tags:
Study Type
mRS 0-2
mRs 0-3
Title
Author
Endovascular Therapy for Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion.
Langezaal
Assessment of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion via a Nationwide Prospective Registry.
BASILAR Artery Study Group
Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (BEST): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Liu
3 studies
3
Evidence quality difference? Registry vs. RCTs does not impact findings
Two included studies were RCTs, while the third (the BASILAR study) reported a prospective registry. While mortality was much higher in this registry for the Medical Therapy arm, and mRS 0-2 and 0-3 were much lower (potentially indicated worse general performance of Medical Therapy), removing the registry did not change the findings of this review.
What is this?